What else is new?

The London 2012 Olympics won't use security technology unless it's being provided by a major sponsor of the event. No matter how much safety your product would contribute to Londoners, there's no chance of it being used unless your company bribes the International Olympic Committee.

Giving an otherwise rather dull and predictable keynote speech at Infosecurity Europe about the IT security demands of running the London Olympics, Derek Wyatt MP has let it slip that UK Government hands are tied when it comes to security technology. He also made it clear that he has no idea where the security threat will come from stating “who are the enemy? I wish I knew” and “don’t ever underestimate the intelligence of the opposition, whoever that is.” But the biggest concern I have over the ramblings of the Right Honourable gentleman came when he started talking about the problems faced in identity management and authentication not only during the event but in the run up to it, with the construction of the venue. Wyatt sound quite upbeat about the possibility of using the London ‘Oyster’ card, used for public transport travel, which could be upgraded fairly easily to incorporate biometric data and turned into a mini-ID card. He also sounded quite impressed with the idea of using the Nokia based authentication system for mobile phones. Upbeat and impressed, and then he dropped the bombshell, which I hope will not be a bad choice of words for the future, when he casually revealed that because neither of these companies was a ‘major sponsor’ of the Olympics their technology could not be used.

Yes, you read that right, as far as the technology behind the security of the London Olympic Games is concerned best of breed and suitability for purpose do not come into, paying a large amount of money to the International Olympic Committee does.

So who has bought their way into being the security experts of choice, and with whom our security and that of the visiting millions will rest? Visa. Oh whoopy-doo, I admit to feeling much more reassured now, after all these are the same people who do not suffer from any problems with identity and authentication and fraud and crime on a huge scale within their own business sector after all. Not.

And in case you are wondering why anyone should get wound up by the ramblings of some MP you have never heard of, the fact that he was speaking in his official capacity as Chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Olympic Group might just grab your attention as it did mine.

Even when questioned by a member of the British Computer Society Security Group who was as shocked as I, and expressed total disbelief that potentially far better technologies were to be overlooked simply because a sponsor had to be used, Wyatt gave a half-hearted shrug of the shoulders response along the lines of it is out of our hands.

Personally I find it beyond contempt that security decisions that will impact upon the whole country, and the billions watching around the world, come down to a money making opportunity for a sponsor rather than being a Government controlled process. Wyatt readily admits it is nothing to do with him, his committee or indeed the Government as the deals arrangements are between the IOC and their sponsors. He also readily admits he doesn’t see why the UK should have to foot the £1billion cost of security in that case.

But again, he misses the point. Security in this case should not be about money, or who foots the bill, but about preventing lives from being lost and terror winning a gold medal on the world stage.

Visa have, as of yet, to reveal what plans it has for the games…

I know. I know. I told myself that I would not. But I didnt have a choice - I was tired, sleepy and there was nothing else around.

Is there anyone who goes into Starbucks and wants to talk to people behind the counter?

Let me explain

So I am in glasgow. I am feeling miserable, tired and sleepy. Why the hell are employees in starbucks being overly nice to everyone who walks in? Who in their right mind walks into Starbucks in the afternoon for that cheerful pick me up from behind the counter? Shut up and give me my coffee! I dont want you to make small talk with me! I just want the shot of java! Shut up! I dont want you to ask me how my day is! Would it be a good day if I am in Starbucks at 2.15 in the afternoon?

An another thing - when I ask for a grande mocha, why do I get half a cup? Did I miss a memo saying that a grande one means fill it up as you feel like? I only noticed it when I took a first sip. I got back to the counter and told them. They filled it up again, but why do I have to ask? Its not like its busy - I am the only one at the counter!

I am just bitching. Sorry.

Mooninites coming to Hub: Theaters ‘toon’ out Tom’s plea
By Tenley Woodman
Boston Herald Features Reporter
Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Score one for the Mooninites.
The “Aqua Teen Hunger Force” movie behind January’s marketing-stunt-turned-bomb-scare opens in Boston Friday (the 13th, no less) despite Mayor Thomas M. Menino’s plea to local theaters not to screen it “out of respect to the people of Boston.”
No such luck. “Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters” opens Friday on two screens: AMC Boston Common and Kendall Square Cinema in Cambridge. Elizabeth Wolfe, vice president of publicity for First Look Pictures, said the film’s distributor had no trouble getting Boston theaters to show it.

As of press time, the mayor’s office had no comment.
Boston came to a near standstill Jan. 31 when more than three dozen battery-powered light boards, some with dangling wires, were discovered around the city. Public safety officials launched an all-out terror response, only to discover the boards depicted the cartoon character Mooninite from “ATHF,” a cult-hit series on Cartoon Network.
The two men who posted the boards still face felony hoax charges; Cartoon Network’s parent company, Turner Broadcasting, and its marketing firm agreed to pay $2 million in restitution to city and state agencies that responded to the terror alert.
With the movie opening looming, the official response from those agencies - including the Massachusetts State Police, Boston Police Department and the attorney general’s office - was “no comment.”
Some pop-culture observers think that’s the most effective tactic.
“I think the worst thing the mayor can do it at this point is to give it legs that it doesn’t already have,” said Doug Quintal, undergraduate program director and executive in residence for the department of marketing communication at Emerson College. “If it was banned in Boston it would get bigger numbers nationally because it would be front-page news.”
January’s brouhaha may spark greater turnout from the film’s target audience, said Sasha Norkin, professor of broadcast journalism at Boston University’s College of Communication.
“I think too much was made of it and Turner stepped up and paid their end of it,” said “Aqua Teen Hunger Force” fan Jeff Burns, 28, of Brighton. “I’m going to go see it anyways.”